to make the comparison meaningful the same midi file capture of my performance was used to render in each tuning using pianoteq 5. The original was performed in Margo’s variation. I thnk the subharmonic version has some interesting aural properties when the sustain pedal is engaged.
Scott Dakota ! Cicada17_Ot_17ed2_RationalDetemper_HarmonicSeries24-48slice_JI(17).scl ! Harmonic series rational detempering of 17ed2. From 21, but centered as 24:25:26:27:28:29:30:32:33:34:36:37:39:40:42:44:46:48. Scott Dakota, Nov 2015. 17 ! 25/24 13/12 9/8 7/6 29/24 5/4 4/3 11/8 17/12 3/2 37/24 13/8 5/3 7/4 11/6 23/12 2/1 ! Cicada17_Ut_17ed2_RationalDetemper_SubHarmonicSeries24-48slice_JI(17).scl ! Sub-harmonic series rational detempering of 17ed2. From 1/21, but centered as 1/(24:25:26:27:28:29:30:32:33:34:36:37:39:40:42:44:46:48). Scott Dakota, Nov 2015. 17 ! 24/23 12/11 8/7 6/5 16/13 48/37 4/3 24/17 16/11 3/2 8/5 48/29 12/7 16/9 24/13 48/25 2/1 Margo Schulter ! 17var-ji4.scl ! Close variation on tuning at x31.eq.com 17 ! 117/112 13/12 44/39 233/199 121/98 169/132 4/3 112/81 81/56 176/117 224/143 13/8 12/7 16/9 224/121 48/25 2/1 Paul Erlich ! Tzitzikas17_Ot_17ed2_RationalDetemper_HarmonicSeries_48-96slice_JI(17).scl ! Harmonic series rational detempering of 17ed2. 48:49:52:54:56:58:60:64:66:68:72:74:76:80:84:88:92:96. By Paul Erlich 01Dec2015, re: Cicada by Scott Dakota 17 ! 49/48 13/12 9/8 7/6 29/24 5/4 4/3 11/8 17/12 3/2 37/24 19/12 5/3 7/4 11/6 23/12 2/1